Private Investment and Government Protection
نویسندگان
چکیده
Hurricane Katrina did massive damage because New Orleans and the Gulf Coast were not appropriately protected. Wherever natural disasters threaten, the government – in its traditional role as public goods provider – must decide what level of protection to provide to an area. It does so by purchasing protective capital, such as levees for a low-lying city. (“Protection” also consists of not imposing threats that raise risk levels (e.g., draining swamps), or enhance losses (e.g., building in high-risk areas.) We show that if private capital is more likely to locate in better-protected areas, then the marginal social value of protection will increase with the level of protection provided. That is, the benefit function is convex, contrary to the normal assumption of concavity. When the government protects and the private sector invests, due to the ill-behaved nature of the benefit function, there may be multiple Nash equilibria. Policy makers must compare them, rather than merely follow local optimality conditions, to find the equilibrium offering the highest social welfare. There is usually considerable uncertainty about the amount of investment that will accompany any level of protection, further complicating the government’s choice problem. We show that when deciding on the current level of protection, the government must take account of the option value of increasing the level of protection in the future. We briefly examine but dismiss the value of rules of thumb, such as building for 1000year floods or other rules that ignore benefits and costs. Forthcoming, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
منابع مشابه
The Impact Of Government Expenditure On GDP, Employment And Private Investment A CGE Model Approach
متن کامل
بررسی آثار سیاست مالی بر سرمایهگذاری بخش خصوصی در ایران
The relationship between the function of the public and private section and exploring this relationship has been a long discussion in macroeconomic. In this paper we attempted to consider the effect of fiscal policies on private section investment in Iran. The fiscal policies include a change in the government’s income and spending, In fact, the main purpose of this paper is to study the degree...
متن کاملInvestigating the Effects of Financial Repression on Private Investment in Agriculture Sector
One of the present phenomena that virtually explain weaknesses in financial systems of different countries is financial repression. Financial repression encompasses the different interferences of governments in financial markets through determining the ceiling interest on bank deposits, high rates of legal reserves, and the government’s interference in distribution of bank credits,which prevent...
متن کاملاثرات کوتاهمدت و بلندمدت مخارج دولت و تورم بر سرمایهگذاری بخش خصوصی در ایران
This article examines the relationships between government expenditures (current and capital) and private investment over the period of 1959- 2007 in Iran. To examine the long and short run relationships between model variables, the dynamic auto regression approach with distributed lag (ARDL) and the standard Granger causality relationship has been used. Findings indicate that based on long and...
متن کاملHas Government Investment Crowded Out Private Investment in India?
Pritha Mitra In India, the relationship between government investment and private investment is a controversial issue. Economic theory suggests that government investment, financed by borrowing, reduces the loanable funds available for private investment, driving up interest rates, and reducing the level of private investment. If, as Keynesians argue, the positive impact of increased government...
متن کامل